Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.86.188] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.2) with HTTP id 1893260 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 23:13:32 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] IV-P Cabin Air System To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.2 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 23:13:32 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Bob Pastusek" : I have not researched this as fully as I should, but I understand that the Dukes Controller works just fine in normal mode without a vacuum source; that the vacuum source is only used to fully open the control valve during "emergency pressure dump." I initially intended to install the suction port of a door seal type pump to the Dukes controller and run it only when the emergency dump switch is activiated, but have since elected to vent this vacuum port to the external (unpressurized) air and not install a vacuum source at all. My rationale is that the cabin pressure will bleed off very quickly even without opening this valve. The only disadvantage I could determine is that you lose the ability to vent significant air through the dump valve. I thought that depressurizing the door seal would achieve the same or better venting capability. As this is mostly speculation on my part, I'd really appreciate any words of wisdom on the subject. Thanks, Bob Pastusek >>>I am building a IV-P with an all electric panel. The Dukes cabin pressure control valve requires vacuum to operate, as I understand it, during at least any low differential cabin to outside air pressure periods.<<<