Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:49:49 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [205.152.58.161] (HELO imf01bis.bellsouth.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1884319 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:14:25 -0500 Received: from dgwest ([216.78.8.211]) by imf01bis.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with SMTP id <20021122131612.RCFK19401.imf01bis.bellsouth.net@dgwest> for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:16:12 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <00c701c29229$0d9e7c80$d3084ed8@dgwest> From: "Dana Westphal" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Life Insurance X-Original-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:14:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 I think most "group" insurance policies like the one I have through work cover everything as they do not ask any questions about hobbies, etc. I reckon they figure that the "couch potatoes" will wash with the "extreme sport" group. On the other hand, the policies that I have obtained on my own (outside of work) always ask the flying question, and yes, in my experience there is a substantial premium increase for coverage. As such, I have one without flying coverage (I am more likely to get killed driving to the airport than flying) and one with flying coverage through EAA (they cover experimental flying obviously) and, of course, the one through work (3 policies total). The benefit of this approach is that if I'm in-between jobs I will still be covered with something for all aspects of my life (i.e., flying and non-flying). Dana Westphal L2K-165