Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:15:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ncsmtp03.ogw.rr.com ([24.93.67.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1883343 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:57:25 -0500 Received: from mail7.sc.rr.com (fe7 [24.93.67.54]) by ncsmtp03.ogw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gAL3uxiZ009387 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:56:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from impact.sc.rr.com ([24.88.99.169]) by mail7.sc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:56:09 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20021120225627.00b6e138@pop-server.sc.rr.com> X-Sender: sreeves@pop-server.sc.rr.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 X-Original-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:57:19 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" From: Steve Reeves Subject: Re: [LML] lml RE: Stall Strips In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I have stall strips on my Glasair I and do mild aerobatics and don't seem to have any adverse effects (I'm still alive). Steve At 04:13 PM 11/19/2002 -0500, you wrote: >I wanted to ask the same question, if anyone has experience with them on >the 320/360? I talked to someone with a Glasair III, he had the standard >type strips on the inboard stub wing. I took dimensions on his AC if >anyone wants them. Anyway, he was very pleased with the results, and I >was planning on doing it. Just wondering if it could have an adverse >effect on aerobatics? Your critical angle of attack would remain the >same, so I think not.