Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [63.114.235.82] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.1)
  with HTTP id 1881943 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:28:21 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Experimental Identification
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.1
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:28:21 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1881943@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001701c28fe8$042eb630$6401a8c0@babboo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Bill Schleifer" <bill@schleifer.net>:

I only have a few hundred hours but I don't recall hearing
"Experimental" used as identification very often.  In practice I believe
most, if not all, controllers and tower dwellers recognize Lancair as
experimental and that identification is heard frequently and presumably
understood.  To date, I've not had occasion to deal with the FAA for
reasons other than applying for certifications.  Have they ever been
known to press this point?

Bill
Legacy 130