Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:01:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com ([216.148.227.88] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1881834 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:18:28 -0500 Received: from rwcrwbc69 ([204.127.198.52]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021119151812.HCLD1052.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@rwcrwbc69> for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:18:12 +0000 Received: from [156.153.254.68] by rwcrwbc69; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:18:06 +0000 From: olsen25@attbi.com X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: Better brakes fo ES X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:18:06 +0000 X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Nov 5 2002) X-Authenticated-Sender: b2xzZW4yNUBhdHRiaS5jb20= X-Original-Message-Id: <20021119151812.HCLD1052.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@rwcrwbc69> Ed and others, I am nearing completion of my 320 kit (vintage 1994). It still has the original Matco brake pads. Should I change the pads to Cleveland pads now or wait until the Matco pads are worn out? What is the observed performance difference between them? Also, Ed, you mentioned a break-in procedure for the brake pads. Can you give me more information on this? Thanks! Dan Olsen 320 MKII 85% Fort Collins, CO