Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:04:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com ([24.29.99.227] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1855318 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 09:36:17 -0500 Received: from computer (66-108-112-238.nyc.rr.com [66.108.112.238]) by nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.1/Road Runner SMTP Server 1.0) with SMTP id gA7EW4lZ005205 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:32:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Jack Cowell" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: S-Tec, part 2 X-Original-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:31:25 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal Thanks to all who responded to my lazy S-Tec questions. Though we haven't yet had a chance to flight test the key suggestions, it appears that a solution lies somewhere in combining different resistor values in the computer (going from 18K to 12K) and increasing servo clutch settings. Though many wrote that they have also experienced increased control pressures with altitude, the question remains as to what generates this increased control heaviness -- which is particularly evident in roll. Some pilots thought it was involved with pressurization and the changed shape of the pressure vessel or the counterbalancing forces exerted by boots on the control rods. But the Mooney I used to fly exhibited the same extreme stiffness in the Flight Levels. That leads me to think that this control "stiffness" is brought on by aerodynamic forces, thin air, or some other combination of aeronautical events that are waaaay beyond my knowledge base. I am very interested in hearing anyone's thoughts on this. Many thanks again for all the thoughtful postings. Jack Cowell