Return-Path: Received: from server9.wans.net ([216.75.0.37]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:17:17 -0500 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by server9.wans.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA26736 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 22:18:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from IP-216-75-10-90.wans.net(216.75.10.90), claiming to be "oemcomputer" via SMTP by server9.wans.net, id smtpdAAAa006Vt; Tue Jan 12 22:18:32 1999 Message-ID: <000501be3eab$fba0c620$5a0a4bd8@oemcomputer> From: "bobjude" To: "Lancair Mail List" Subject: Fuel Pressure Gage or not to gage Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 22:19:56 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Don Gordon, I hope you took note of Christopher Zavatson's post yesterday concerning installation of a fuel pressure gage. I wholeheartedly agree with it. An off-field landing in a Lancair is not a challenge that I would be looking forward to. The more instruments that I have to monitor power plant performance the better. In other words, the small cost of a fuel pressure gage is very cheap insurance protection, considering the potential benefit. Happy Building, Bob Jude N65BJ