Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:06:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from news.vallnet.com ([206.25.206.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1847735 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:51:31 -0500 Received: from nemisis.vallnet.com ([206.25.206.1]) by news.vallnet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 186aWY-0001Hm-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:51:30 -0600 Received: from secure.vallnet.com ([206.25.206.55] helo=vallnet.com) by nemisis.vallnet.com with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 186aWT-0007Vl-00; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:51:25 -0600 X-Original-Sender: gwolf@vallnet.com From: gwolf@vallnet.com Reply-to: gwolf@vallnet.com X-Original-To: (Lancair Mailing List) Subject: Re: More information on V-8 crash X-Mailer: WebMAIL to Mail Gateway v3.0m X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:49:47 -0600 Priority: normal X-Original-Message-id: <3dbeca3b.4d26.20604@vallnet.com> X-Scanner: exiscan *186aWT-0007Vl-00*pPkrDLe2S96* (VALLEY INTERNET LLC FAYETTEVILLE, TN USA) Attention Rick Schrameck and anyone else who likes to jump to conclusion: Your most recent post is an most gross example of misuse of this list. It should be confined to facts, not mud slinging. Yes, the Beechcraft was involved in a accident in which the plane was destroyed and its 2 occupants lost their lives. Yes, the right engines prop was feathered. Yes, they were attempting an emergency landing with one engine in zero-zero conditions which was unsuccessful. The rest of your post is pure speculation. "I spoke with a reliable source " - Will you name your source? "I have been adamant in past post about the poor design and un reliable information that came out of that company" - We have been awaiting the conclusions of the NTSB report (due in a day or two) about the cause of the accident before giving any information about the accident. We feel that is the proper way to handle the situation - not disseminate suppositions and accusations as you are prone to. "I also understand that Jim's old EngineAir powered IV-P plane crashed a few weeks before" - please elaborate on the circumstances of this incident, please. We lost track of it after it was delivered to Mexico and the locals tried to rebuild the front strut instead of sending it back to the factory. "If anyone needs any more information about the crash they can contact me by phone or direct e-mail. This is not the place to talk about specifics of the crash only that it happened." - You have my email address above - please send me all the information you have. And this is also not the place to sling mud or issue veiled accusations without substantiation. " EngineAir customers and pilots, beware of the power plant you have installed" Instead, you should caution ALL pilots to know all their systems thoroughly, including essential items to be checked before flight. I am currently flying behind a V8 (and have a minor investment in the company) and am very carefully putting it through a test program to accertain it's limits and reliability. No company can choose it's customers or monitor it's customers use of the product (look at any product you buy.) We are confident that the NTSB report will show that the cause of the crash was NOT unreliability of the engine. If so, I trust you will print an apology and retraction of your statements. If the report is otherwise, I will do the same. Gary Wolf (Lancair IVP-V8)