Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:21:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([209.26.218.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with ESMTP id 1845037 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:20:07 -0400 Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.54]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:10:22 -0400 Received: from sdn-ap-003watacop0456.dialsprint.net ([63.187.209.202] helo=f3g6s4) by conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1859zd-0001gV-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:19:38 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <005801c27c5b$9d3d3ea0$cad1bb3f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: LNC2 - Higher Compression Pistions in an IO320 X-Original-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:20:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In response to Lee "Q-Tip" Metcalfe regarding the subject: Since I fly an early 235 with the Lyc O-235-L2C with the Lycoming hi comp. pistons, my experience will not necessarily be germane to your O-320 and is merely anecdotal. But FWIW, I've had no problems in the 500+ hours since I changed out the original pistons. I've seen very little change in temperatures in all flight regimes, however that may be because I over-did the cooling system and have always had temps that were actually somewhat too low (except for unusually long ground hold times in the summer). According to the Lycoming data, these pistons raise the engine's HP about 7 to 8%, e.g., from 118 continuous to about 125. Unfortunately, I can't say what, if any, performance improvement was gained since I also went to a MT C/S prop at the same time. My only concern at this time is the bruhaha over the availability of 100LL in the future since I'm sure the higher compression would not take kindly to any lower octane fuel. I have no idea what the detonation margin for my engine is now with 100LL but I'm sure it would be lower (and perhaps problematic) with unleaded or otherwise lower octane fuel. Cheers, Dan Schaefer