Return-Path: Received: from portal.udlp.com ([207.109.1.80]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:22:25 -0500 Received: from portal.udlp.com (root@localhost) by portal.udlp.com with ESMTP id KAA03295 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:23:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from ccmail.udlp.com ([128.254.66.12]) by portal.udlp.com with ESMTP id KAA03263 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:23:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from ccMail by ccmail.udlp.com (IMA Internet Exchange 3.11) id 001DD8F4; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:25:14 -0600 From: CHRISTOPHER_ZAVATSON@udlp.com Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:15:43 -0600 Message-ID: <001DD8F4.C21254@udlp.com> Subject: vacuum pump fittings To: Lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>The threads in the pump are standard pipe threads like the ones on a >>mating AN fitting. The popular mythology (promulgated, no doubt< by >>the pump/fitting makers) is that there's too much "restriction loss" >>in a standard AN 90 degree pipe to hose fitting. Nonsense! Maybe, >>just >>maybe, if you needed every bit of the flow from the pump to drive a >>lot of stuff in addition to what you're probably driving, i.e., an >>artificial horizon and heading indicator, you might need to go with >>ultra-low- restriction fittings. >>Your vacuum regulator is probably going to bleed off half the flow >>anyway, so why ream your wallet if you don't have to? I agree that a lot of flow is bled off at the regulator. A different argument that could be made for low loss fittings is pump cooling. The pump will move more air as the restriction on the inlet and outlet ports is reduced. This will cause the regulator to start dumping sooner as the normal operating vacuum will be reached at a lower engine rpm. Just a thought. Chris Zavatson N91CZ