Return-Path: Received: from www01.netaddress.usa.net ([204.68.24.21]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 04:24:36 -0500 Received: (qmail 14828 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 1999 09:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <19990111092600.14827.qmail@www01.netaddress.usa.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:26:00 From: Dan Schaefer To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Oil coolers (and bad proof-reading of my posts) X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Bill, depends on which engine yu're flying behind. I'm flying with an O-235 (slightly pumped up with the Hi-comp pistons) and I'm doing just fine with the smaller cooler, once I inscreased the SCAT diameter to # inchces - it's fed from about a 3/5 inch NACA scoop. ************************************** After reading what I posted yesterday, I see several things that need correcting. Would have been alright if I'd spent more time prof-reading what I write, sorry about that! Actually, why do we add such auperfluous letters as the "o" to the word "you" anyway? "Yu" still sounds ok to me. And "inscreasing" is actually the correct word when applied to "SCAT" tubing, so I'll let that stand. The real problem is in the numbers; the SCAT tube diameter was inscreased to 3 inches and it's fed from a 3.5 inch (about) NACA scoop. In the winter, even here in Southern Calif., I've had to block the cooler off nearly 90% to keep the oil temp up in the middle of the green. Dan Schaefer