Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:18:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [209.210.29.4] (HELO haaga.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1794798 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:42:17 -0400 Received: from utahweb.com [208.187.27.168] by haaga.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id AF47384B0172; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:49:59 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <3D98FD07.83E93C26@utahweb.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:40:23 -0600 From: "Charles L. Keller" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mail List Subject: Re: LNC2 elevator gaps Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. Angier: Since your post (with illustrations) on this subject several people have raised questions that echoed my own, but we've seen no further elaboration. Did your process apply micro to the trailing edge of the HS or the leading edge of the elevator? And what was the purpose of second aluminum angle? I sense there is a very useful procedure here if I could understand it. Charles --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Utahweb]