Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:05:02 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp-server4.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1794677 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:24:25 -0400 Received: from ofcdesktop1 (231.142.33.65.cfl.rr.com [65.33.142.231]) by smtp-server4.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g8UNOKlb012238 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:24:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <00aa01c268d8$8a4de2e0$0100000a@ofcdesktop1> From: "Ted Noel" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: L-IV-P elevator sensitivity X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:24:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Having flown the factory demonstrator, it is my feeling that the L-IV-P is more sensitive in pitch than would be desirable for good control harmony. Certainly those with more flight experience (Brent Regan, are you listening?) can comment on this issue. It would appear to be desirable to reduce the pitch sensitivity of the aircraft. Several solutions appear to be possible. 1) Anti-servo Tab. This would obviously work, but provides another mechanical item build and to fail. 2) Adjust the attachment point of the elevator pushrod to the weldment. This would be incredibly simple, basically requiring a single hole (thru 2 plates) to be drilled. Rumor has it that this was the final fix to the 320 pitch sensitivity after the big tail mod. The problem would be whether it would work, and how far to move the hole. The current arm is 2 3/4" from the pivot to the pushrod hole (on centers). Would a 3/4" move (a 28% move) be appropriate? 3) Increase the horizontal tail volume by adding about 3" to the chord of the stab. (It starts about 13-14"). This would be an increase of just under 25% in volume. This is some work, but is mechanically simple, with no moving parts. Note that this would be across the entire span, not a strake (like an F-16 leading edge extension) that energizes the air to increase elevator sensitivity. Can any of you aerodynamic geniuses comment? Ted Noel _____________________ The Bible Only: If the Bible Doesn't Teach It, Neither Will We. http://www.bibleonly.org