Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:34:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1793330 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:57:14 -0400 Received: from perigee.net (dial1-240.clt.perigee.net [166.82.201.240]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8SLvBmW020772 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:57:13 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <3D9625BE.552CEF8C@perigee.net> X-Original-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:57:18 -0400 From: John Schroeder X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: " (Lancair Mailing List)" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: RAM-air induction References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Villi - Compared to many of the rest of us who splatter words on a page with less than passable grammar and marginal spelling, your English is, to put it conservatively, rather close to perfect. I also appreciated your calm, reasoned and mild approach approach - contrary to that of some other folks who inhabit this net. Cheers, John Schroeder > > What I want to say is, there is plenty of room for losses (and there will > be) in the induction system, if we are going for RAM boost, but will still > have a gain. > > If anybody can tell me where my assumptions are wrong, I would love to be > enlighted. Please bear with my poor english. >