Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:44:08 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1702601@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <dfs155@earthlink.net>
Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6)
  with ESMTP id 1702603 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:37:33 -0400
Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.50])
          by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com
          for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:30:02 -0400
Received: from sdn-ap-003watacop0489.dialsprint.net ([63.187.209.235] helo=f3g6s4)
	by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 17hvtj-0000dl-00
	for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:37:32 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <004901c24a02$a99501a0$ebd1bb3f@f3g6s4>
Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" <dfs155@earthlink.net>
From: "Dan Schaefer" <dfs155@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair list" <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: Re: delaminations of aileron counterweight web LNC2
X-Original-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:37:58 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Scott wrote: "Lancair's original design did not require stiffening webs."

As a builder of 235 kit #52, let me quibble a bit about those words. It
would be more correct to say: "Lancair's original *construction manual* did
not require stiffening webs."

In my opinion, all early LNC2's "require" such stiffeners (the extension of
the lower aileron skin that holds the counter-weight was quite flexible and
therefore, a pretty good spring) - it just wasn't appreciated back then, I
guess.

Dan Schaefer