Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:34:35 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1701717@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <rob@ct.picker.com>
Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6)
  with ESMTP id 1701714 for lml@lancair.net; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:33:08 -0400
Received: from [144.54.52.3] (HELO logan.ct.picker.com)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with SMTP id 15250441 for lml@lancair.net; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:33:07 -0400
Received: by logan.ct.picker.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id LAA07378; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:31:17 -0400
X-Original-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:31:17 -0400
From: rob@ct.picker.com (Rob Logan)
X-Original-Message-Id: <200208211531.LAA07378@logan.ct.picker.com>
X-Original-To: lml@lancair.net
Subject: Re: PRISM vs FADEC


> read and understand how to deal with the FADEC fuel system failure modes
> than it will take him to brush up on existing cold starts, hot starts, etc. 
 
ah yes...  when does one accept the risk of added failure modes for some
benefit...      
 
would you fly an EFIS if it displayed an image of your old HSI?               
 
would you fly electrically powered mags if it didn't find best power /   
economy for you? 
 
it takes a total new way (HITS or best power computer) for me.