Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:15:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1701386 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:16:15 -0400 Received: from WINDWALKR1@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v33.5.) id q.103.1a24c5da (3972) for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:16:12 -0400 (EDT) From: WINDWALKR1@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <103.1a24c5da.2a9451ec@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:16:12 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lance has a new Nickname for IVP Owners X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10500 AVIDWIZ@aol.com says "...should we be insulted or complimented?" ridgedickey@hotmail.com says "don't be so sensitive." I hear what you say, but that's being too nice regarding this "issue". I don't see an issue here, and I certainly don't see any sensitivity...to be sensitive would be to stop and think before piping up to promote the negative side of anything relating to the Lancair company. I have a significant investment in this company, and I think most of us do. Mine is as follows: 1. Emotionally, I've had an excellent relationship with Lancair for ten years...buying and building and flying their wonderful aircraft. Top-notch support all the way, and the greatest people you could ask for. I want to do what I can to foster this relationship and keep it going and growing. I want the company to be there long into the future. 2. Financially, my Lancair is an important asset, and I want to keep its' value up. I don't take kindly to sustained sniping at 'my' company....it directly lowers the value of my investment. So we shouldn't be nice about this. This "issue" is not helping any of us in any way. It offends me to even be talking about it, but I would answer the question by saying I hope Lance's nickname for me would be "old friend". Ken Lanham