Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 13:49:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r01.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.97] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b6) with ESMTP id 1680835 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Aug 2002 12:54:26 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v33.5.) id q.1ad.61bf3ab (30954) for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:54:19 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1ad.61bf3ab.2a7c133b@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:54:19 EDT Subject: Assembly Hours X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108 Seems to me a car is about as complicated as our airplanes, yet they are assembled in about 45 minutes. Why can't we build airplanes that way? Okay, I know that the car companies invest gazillions of dollars (or yen) making automated welding stations for welding up a car's "fuselage", but even looking at systems installation or firewall-forward, they make airplane factories look like pre-school. (This observation is not limited to Lancair but pertains to all aircraft manufacturers, civilian and military.) I understand that the Eclipse jet production line is being developed by one of the lead production guys from Toyota. Maybe they know something we don't? While this is not particularly relevant to the LML mail list, I'd also be real interested in ideas for streamlining an aircraft production line, since my present job will require establishing a small (100 per year) production line for a 4600 pound two-seat jet, and I'll be the first to admit that all my experience is in "onesie-twosie" stuff. Please contact me directly on this. - Rob Wolf