Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [144.54.3.10] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b6)
  with HTTP id 1660072 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:40:06 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Turbine power
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b6
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:40:06 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1660072@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <BOEALMKHMGHGHBENGEKGMECNCDAA.bjburr@mwheli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Bryan J. Burr" <bjburr@mwheli.com>:

There are a few other positive considerations:
1: Weight.  Typically turbines are much lighter than recip engines for the
same or greater horsepower.
2: Reliability:  Turbine engines are much more reliable. (Certified anyway)
than recip engines.

It was good to see you at the Lancair dinner at Oshkosh.

Thanks,
Bryan Burr
ES hopefull (October 2002 kit delivery)