Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.165.45] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b4) with HTTP id 1623301 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:06:38 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Stall recovery and spin avoidance To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b4 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:06:38 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <523A812DEFEBD3119C2F00508B938198E2325F@cmb_nt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for John Jessen : Nice post. Keep it up. John -----Original Message----- Wrom: LKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARH This is beginning to sound like a discussion about the 'boggy man'. First consider the loss of lift at the full stall. Approximately 10% of the total. Second consider the loss of Q from a couple of knots above the stall to stalled. Less than 2 % Third consider the stall progression. Trailing edge root to tip. Finally in a Lancair you do not have all the aileron in the world and you don't have much deflection. The ball in your turn coordinator or turn and bank is big, biggest black indicator on the panel and this is for a reason as applies to pilots. Coordinate. This does not mean 'all the aileron in the world' or only rudder. ...snip...