Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 03:24:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2) with ESMTP id 1293834 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:38:58 -0400 Received: from smtp-server6.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.43]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:33:19 -0400 Received: from tednoel (231.142.33.65.cfl.rr.com [65.33.142.231]) by smtp-server6.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g5F1cvfJ002914 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:38:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <001501c2140d$eb92ec00$0100000a@cfl.rr.com> From: "Ted Noel" X-Original-To: Subject: Stalls X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:42:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 To all, In the discussion of stalls so far, I have not seen any comments on devices that might make stalls more detectable or manageable. Does anyone know of a good installation, for example, of stall strips such as many spam cans have? These simple wedge shaped strips near the wing root seem to be designed to trip the root to a stall while the tip is still flying. And their shape and position generally has little effect on cruise speed. Such a device would seem to be a valuable addition to our speedsters. Ted Noel L-IV-P 90% done (It seems 90% to go!) __________________________ The Bible Only: If the Bible doesn't teach it, neither will we. http://www.bibleonly.org