Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.38]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:07:16 -0500 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.73.162.205]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.05 118 121 101) with SMTP id <19981217230828.PAZD18214@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 23:08:28 +0000 Message-ID: <001c01be2a00$f713f740$cda2490c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: 320 Service Ceiling Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:05:22 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To all you 320 owners, I have a question for all of you. What is the service ceiling of the 320? Is there a difference between the service ceiling of the O-320 and the IO320? If so, what is the difference? I have an opportunity to purchase a reman'd O-320 at a considerable savings over the factory price. But, if the service ceiling is going to be prohibitive, then I'd rather spend the money getting the extra altitude. Please help me make up my mind on this. You all did such an excellent job convincing me of what canopy style to go with, I'm sure that I won't have any question after I hear from you on this topic. Thanks, Curtis Krouse N753K