Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:34:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1253020 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:34:01 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.3c.1f079660 (4420) for ; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:33:57 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <3c.1f079660.2a292a24@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:33:56 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Vacuum v all electric X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 Reliability and redundancy is the key here for serious IFR work. Warning systems that cue the pilot to failures is imperative. A vacuum guage is not a warning device. Flying partial panel is a dream-- unless you are practicing it very often. Jeff