Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:42:19 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1252792@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <skipslater@earthlink.net>
Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.50] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1)
  with ESMTP id 1252733 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 31 May 2002 10:57:03 -0400
Received: from lsanca1-ar16-4-47-001-207.lsanca1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net ([4.47.1.207] helo=skip)
	by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2)
	id 17DnpS-0004lb-00
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 31 May 2002 07:56:34 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <000801c208b3$82186440$9200a8c0@mshome.net>
From: "Skip Slater" <skipslater@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1252623@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Vacuum v all electric
X-Original-Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 07:57:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

"So who are you going to listen to? The experienced pilots who have weighed
in here or the inexperienced ones?

Jeff Edwards"

Jeff,
   I'm experienced (14,000+ hours, ATP and major airline Captain) and I
agree with the comments made about the vac/electric combo.  In fact, that's
what I put in my ES.  I'd go all electric if I had to do it over again, but
only due to a simpler installation and ease of future removal- NOT due to
reliability issues.
   Does my opinion count?
   Skip Slater
   95% IO=540 ES