Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:01:07 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [206.251.252.16] (HELO smtp.adnc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1252407 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 May 2002 22:40:04 -0400 Received: from mark (dialup-209-216-221-218.adnc.net [209.216.221.218]) by smtp.adnc.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8600929569 for ; Thu, 30 May 2002 19:39:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020530193938.0079bea0@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: mdavis/mail.adnc.com@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 19:39:38 -0700 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net From: Mark Davis Subject: Legacy Canopy Fit Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Don - As I've described in a separate post to you, we've experienced the problem of the gas struts lifting the canopy about 1/8" along its leading edge. Prior to attaching the struts, we were able to achieve essentially an absolutely perfect fit with the fuselage (only had to split the skin in 4 places to achieve it!!) When connected, the struts then provided enough force to push the leading edge of the canopy up about 1/8" particularly on the port side. We tried a number of solutions moving the struts down and out various distances (used an Al plate as a temporary attachment so that we didn't have to keep redrilling the firewall). We moved them down 1/2", 3/4" and 1" from the original locations and then out 1/2" and 1" at each of these heights as well. None of these locations worked perfectly but the best seemed to be simply down about 1/2" on the firewall. This resulted in a fairly good fit except for about a 1/16" + rise on the forward port quarter. We then removed the canopy, strapped the very front section with a carpenter strap and heated the leading edge to try and bow the leading edge slightly to bring the it down a bit more - fairly successful but not perfect. Since we were within about 1/16" for only about 9-10" on one section of the leading edge we decided to body work out this remaining rise. It seems very obvious that he geometry of to 106# gas struts is the source of the problem. Will be very interested in seeing what Lancair comes up with to solve the problem. Mark Davis Legacy #162