Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 07:59:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m07.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.162] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1252386 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 May 2002 22:03:28 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id q.39.27daa841 (4413) for ; Thu, 30 May 2002 22:03:03 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <39.27daa841.2a2833d7@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 22:03:03 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Vacuum v all electric X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 >>SNIP I disagree with the group consensus that all-electric is the only way to go. I'm a fairly inexperienced IFR pilot -- And let's not forget my resolution to practice partial panel on a regular basis. It's all about risk management. >> So who are you going to listen to? The experienced pilots who have weighed in here or the inexperienced ones? Jeff Edwards