Return-Path: Received: from mail.akos.net ([209.194.60.5]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:31:13 -0500 Received: from home.akos.net (root@home.akos.net [209.194.60.20]) by mail.akos.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA14044 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:30:52 -0500 Received: from akos.net (ppp10.npr1.akos.net [209.194.57.11]) by home.akos.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA32021 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:30:38 -0500 Message-ID: <36744E18.614D8AC8@akos.net> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:30:33 -0500 From: Tom Giddings To: Lancair Mail List Subject: 360 Weight/Balance X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Scott, My 360 has the long mount and small tail... The empty weight forward cg 23.04. I should say I also have the long wing tips and a very full panel... My reason for my Questions is I am considering stripping the airplane and starting over. I have a very heavy paint job. It is pretty but............ I was told I could have as much as 100# of paint on my plane. The info you provided would seem to disprove that theory. I find it difficult to beleive that even the heaviest paint job on a 360 could weigh more than 30#. I also have the Hartzel two blade constant speed prop. The big Question is is it worth the trouble to try and lighten up the airplane. Is it a safety issue to be so heavy. My performance in climb and cruise appear to be inline with and even maybe a bit better than most I have compared to. I am seeking a little guidance in this matter. What say all of you? Tom Giddings 360TM(chubby)