Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 00:44:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.4.33.125] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b1) with ESMTP id 1236979 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 May 2002 22:24:56 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 13 May 2002 19:24:56 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [65.142.74.65] From: "Jim Farrell" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail List" Subject: 320 Engine in a 235? X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 21:09:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.00.0021.1900 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1FAC2.83033730" X-Original-Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2002 02:24:56.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A109EB0:01C1FAEE] ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1FAC2.83033730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My 235 now has a 0-290-D2 engine and I am thinking about upgrading to a 0= -320. The engines are about the same physical size, with the 320 a little heavi= er. Would like to hear from someone who has a 235/320 concerning the prob= lems and benefits of the conversion. =20 Jim Farrell 235Z ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1FAC2.83033730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My 235 now has= a 0-290-D2 engine and I am thinking about upgrading to a 0-320.
The engines are about the same physical size, with the 320 a little he= avier. Would like to hear from someone who has a 235/320 concerning the p= roblems and benefits of the conversion.
Jim Farrell
235Z

------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1FAC2.83033730--