Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 01:05:00 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 1166871 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:50:33 -0400 Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.10]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:46:23 -0400 Received: from optonline.net (ool-18ba44db.dyn.optonline.net [24.186.68.219]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GUP00GDD42WAY@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:49:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:47:26 -0400 From: Adam Molny Subject: More on Ritchie Electronic Compass X-Original-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Original-Message-id: <3CBCFE5E.E41EFCD@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en References: <20020415040416.AAA1850@pop3.olsusa.com> > If, by "self-appointed authority, > you mean the certifying entities within the FAA, then their standards > for avionics performance have racked up a pretty impressive record for > safe operation. I've flown behind certified avionics truly awful, with Cessna autopilots as a prime example. Also, the LED displays on our Bendix King Silver Crown radios failed regularly. FAA certification does not neccesarily guarantee quality or reliability. > <<<...The wiring problem may be as simple as adding RF chokes > (little iron donuts) to the device's power lines...>>> > > I guess the PhD's who developed SFS > are really lamenting the fact that they didn't have your BSEE available to > them. I'll bet choke cores are much cheaper than the ASIC's, shielding, and > other technology they used to refine the RF immunity embodied therein. You shouldn't be intimidated by the challenge of adding noise suppression to a circuit board, it's really quite simple. Decoupling capacitors throughout the board connect the power and ground planes, a passive filter cleans up the incoming power, and shielding is nothing more than strategically placed sheet metal which is bonded to analog gound. Custom ASICs are unrelated to the noise issue. > > >There are simple, well-known measures which can be taken > >to alleviate the problem.... > > The methods you have described are the correct approach to take to fix > an inadequately designed product. > There are just as well known and significantly more effective measures > to deal with the RF problems during the design phase... We are really talking about internal versus external noise suppression. If I buy a $30,000 EFIS, I certainly expect it to hook directly to the avionics power bus and have it work under all conditions. If my $60 electronic compass requires external filtering to tolerate spikes and dips in voltage, I am willing to spend a few dollars on external components, and devote some time to get it working. It all boils down to time versus money. You can spend lots of money and save hundreds of build hours (Lancair has really spoiled us in this area), or you build on a budget, and do more work yourself. Every builder strikes his own balance, and no one answer is right for everybody. -Adam Molny Legacy #151