Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([205.245.9.229]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA4684 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 20:25:22 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981203202543.02d06000@olsusa.com> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 20:25:43 -0500 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Tom McReynolds (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: Manuals X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I'm going to have to disagree about the quality of the lancair manuals. I consider them to be pretty poor quality. My experience is with the 235 and 320 manuals, perhaps the IV manual is better. There are a lot of places in the manual where the descriptions are incomplete, and there isn't much guidance on determining the soundness of the construction at various stages in the construction process. A good (actually bad) example of this is the forward hinge canopy system. I've been provided with 3 different ways to attach the lifting struts to the fuselage, all of them with problems. Calling lancair wasn't much help. When I got the two methods for the canopy, and called the factory, they verbally told me of a third way to do it! The drawing for the aluminum piece that is called out for in the blueprints can't actually be built according to the drawings; the measurements don't add up. I guess that shouldn't be a problem, since the drawing was never updated to match either of the "new" methods recommended by the factory. If you want some fun, try to figure out how many layers of fiberglass should be put in the canopy slots in the new style header tank lancair will sell you. The blueprints assume that you're converting an old style tank. Don't bother calling the factory: they don't know either. I've been an software engineer for a long time, but I used to be a technical writer in a past life. Maybe I'm being too picky, but it seems that lancair has pretty lousy support for "older" products like the 235 and 360. When a new aircraft comes along (in this case the IV), they tend to dump support of the old planes. Builder beware. Based on the poor fit and finish of the kit pieces, and the weakness of the manuals, I would not recommend this kit to someone who doesn't have a set of transferrable building skills. -Tom