Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #1111
From: Martin Quartim <martinq@cris.com>
Subject: Re: Converting to a MKII tail
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 15:59:24 -0500
To: <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>

I talked to some L-320 pilots about the MK II tail and here is what I heard:

1- "Oh you couldn't tell the difference..."

2- "It is a bit scary when you are taking off and climbing, the nose goes
where it wants..."

3- "I have the small tail and I think it is OK, but you should get the MK
II tail if you can, you will loose just a few knots but you get more pitch
authority for landings and take offs and better horizontal stability for
cross country"

I think a few less knots is a small price to pay for a safer and more
comfortable cross country aircraft.

What is the total speed loss 1,2..3kts?

I am considering to purchase an L-360 Fast built kit with small tail. The
current owner bought the kit around 89 and has done nothing to it.

I understand I can purchase the MK-II tail, outback gear, wing tips and the
new epoxy and use with this older FB kit. What I am not sure of is if there
are any differences between an 1989 L-320/360 FB and the newer L-320/360 MK
II Super FB?

Also I understand that the newer kits come with a lot more work done. Can
some one speculate how much time and work will I save if I get a new kit as
opposed to the older one?

Is the quality and fitting of parts of new kits any better then 1989 kits?

Happy Landings,

Martin
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster