Return-Path: Received: from imo22.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.66]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA7227 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:35:48 -0500 Received: from DHmiel@aol.com by imo22.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id 8ASLa27408 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:26:07 +1900 (EST) From: DHmiel@aol.com Message-ID: <1c5fcbde.364a2b1f@aol.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:26:07 EST To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Partnerships X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Here's another way to operate a partnership. We built our Lancair IV P (six partners) using the same system a Christen Eagle partnership (ten partners) did. That is, we all shared equally in the financial part and absolutely no work time records were kept. Instead, we said that if someone wasn't working on the aircraft, that was fine, but they were missing the fun. This takes the pressure off to get to the hangar and removes any feelings that someone is working harder than someone else. The Eagle subsequently won the Wright award (in 1981)and the partnership is still doing fine though there have been numerous sales of the partnerships in the intervening years. Our Lancair partnership is also working beautifully though we have not entered the airplane in any beauty contests (so far). Moral of the story: beautiful airplanes can be built this way and partnerships can be set up to the benefit of all but care must be taken in both regards. Good Luck in choosing your arrangement, Dave Hmiel L IV P N235LP