Return-Path: Received: from asbestos.eai.com ([12.10.41.146]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA932 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:49:57 -0500 Received: from goliath.eai.com (relay [10.1.1.81]) by asbestos.eai.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA17309 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from eai.com ([10.1.20.31]) by goliath.eai.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA01101 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:53:42 -0600 (CST) Really-From: olsen@eai.com Message-ID: <3649B020.B1885CD5@eai.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 08:41:20 -0700 From: "Daniel M. Olsen" Organization: Engineering Animation, Inc. To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: attitude sensors X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I remember seeing a video of the guys flying their R/C model with the electrostatic sensors on the wingtips, nose and tail. It was quite impressive. I used to work for Rockwell-Collins (avionics) and a couple guys there knew the people who were doing the experiments. The big drawback is that the sensors measure the electrostatic field of the earth. You can think of this field as concentric shells around the earth. However, geographic features disturb this field. The field wants to be parallel to the ground. When you introduce things like mountains the field "bends". So, if you fly near a mountain, an autopilot connected to these sensors would think that following the contour of the mountain is level :) Dan -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Daniel M. Olsen 970.225.8104 phone Principal Software Engineer 970.690.1848 cellular Engineering Animation, Inc. 888.390.7339 fax http://www.eai.com olsen@eai.com