Return-Path: Received: from neti.saber.net ([205.139.65.2]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA923 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 23:19:02 -0500 Received: from default (s-s3-p1-65153.saber.net [205.139.65.153]) by neti.saber.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA20401 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 20:19:13 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199811020419.UAA20401@neti.saber.net> From: "fred" To: "Lancair List" Subject: longer mount Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 20:14:18 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> pine asks why not add aviation grade alluminun spacers instead of getting the longer mount? 1. the longer mount puts the C G way forward which causes the plane to fly way- way better. 2. The additional space created by the longer mount is a godsend to working space in the accesory area. 3. you don't have to dish the fire wall for the oil filter or spend extra $$$$ on an airwolf remote. 4. It looks a hell of a lot sexier with a longer nose. Is 4 enough or should I continue? Fred N9BF Don't fly like my brother!!!