Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 799067 for rob@logan.com; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:47:43 -0400 Received: from imo-m09.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.164]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:42:00 -0400 Received: from Epijk@aol.com by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.22.) id k.41.cb7e59b (17527) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:49:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Epijk@aol.com Message-ID: <41.cb7e59b.28591dde@aol.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:49:50 EDT Subject: Re: Powder Coating Aluminum To: lancair.list@olsusa.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Your motor mount is probably 4130 steel in the normalized condition. 400=B0F= =20 won't affect the temper of that metal. However, depending on the specific=20 material and heat treat condition of the aluminum (7076-T6? 6061-T6?=20 2024-T3?) a 400=B0F soak could degrade the material properties quite a bit.=20= 20=20 minutes might not hurt, but do you want to experiment? BTW, the fact that your motor mount hasn't failed in 35 hours is essentially= =20 meaningless data. Try to understand the difference between high-cycle fatigu= e=20 properties and ultimate tensile properties. Jack Kane EPI, Inc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>