Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([205.245.9.226]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA14138 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 10:59:36 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981031105726.00751130@olsusa.com> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 10:57:26 -0500 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: Re:Exhaust and Heat Muff, Hydraulic Gages X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Scott Dahlgren asks about interference between the 60 amp B&C alternator and the exhaust heat muff on the 320. I have the 360 engine and don't know if this makes a difference. But while the components are close, I don't seem to have an interference. I'm just now poking around in that area and have realised that the heat muff can be removed, and reversed so that the two scat flanges can be oriented in a better way for plumbing. My exhaust is the Lancair 3/4 style, probably the same as yours. On the subject of taping the exhaust system; People in automotive have looked at ways to cut the heat loss around the pipe upstream of the catalysts in an attempt to light them off sooner. The vast majority of hydrocarbons emitted from the tail pipe in the EPA tests happen in the first 60 seconds of engine start before the catalyst has had time to come up to temperature. To my knowledge there are no thermodynamic (read power or economy) benefits to insulating the exhaust. A couple of weeks ago someone asked who the manufacturer of my panel mounted hydraulic gages is. The Lancair avionics people told me that they are reconditioned units dating back a long time. They could not locate a source for new gages that would fit. Next time I talk to Lancair I will ask for the reconditioning source. Regards, Ed de Chazal