Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3207993 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 May 2004 21:43:26 -0400 Received: (qmail 1568 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 01:43:25 -0000 Received: from 65-73-33-136.bras01.cok.tn.frontiernet.net (HELO frontiernet.net) ([65.73.33.136]) (envelope-sender ) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.18) with SMTP for ; 6 May 2004 01:43:25 -0000 Message-ID: <409998EC.8FA9B723@frontiernet.net> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 20:46:20 -0500 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Pulley Sizing (was Coolant Pressure Gauge) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If I mean to run my 13B at 7500-8000 I'll need a sure 'nuff oversize alternator pulley and probably EWP. By that time EWP should be well proven :o) My Lyc alternator is overdriven way too much IMO and I aim to go with a bigger pulley. But I'll have to build it myself :o(( ... But it will transfer to my 13B alt :o)) ... Jim S. Mark Steitle wrote: > Mike, > I will measure my e-shaft pulley when I get home tonight, but I'm sure it > is larger than 4.5". I wouldn't be too concerned with a 10,800 rpm's max > for the alternators, but with a 5.5" (17.28" circumference) e-shaft pulley > and a 2.5" (7.85" circumference) alternator pulley, the ratio is > 2.2:1. So, the alternators would be turing 15,840 rpm at 7200 engine > rpm. That is 58% over the 10,000 rpm figure. That what makes me nervous. > > Since multi-V belts have become so commonplace, I feel certain that I can > find something around 4.5" that I can adapt. Guess I'll have to make a > trip to Pic-A-Part and see what I can find. > > Mark > > At 02:03 PM 5/5/2004 -0700, you wrote: > >The alternator speed isn't a problem, it doesn't care how fast you spin it > >(unless you have an alternator that is way out of balance). On my RV-4 > >with Lycoming engine the alternator is over-driven about 4:1, I have the > >2-1/2 inch stock alternator pulley, the crank/ring gear pulley is about > >10" diameter so the alternator will see 10,000 at cruise. This is typical > >of most Lycoming installations on experimentals and is not a problem on > >thousands of planes. > > > >My e-shaft pulley is 4-1/2 inches dia. I think it is a stock pulley as > >the timing pointer is at the edge of the pulley. That makes the > >alternator over-driven at 1.8:1. Using a 6000 rpm cruise with my RD-1C > >that makes the alternator spin at 10,800. Close enough. > > > >There are enough Lyc drivers that were uncomfortable with this that > >someone makes a 4" pulley for the alternator. Aircraft Spruce 02-03 > >catalog page 245, p/n 07-06828 $48.95. (A waste o' money except for the > >feel good factor. If you'll accept MY explanation I'll accept your 48.95 > >and SAVE YOU shipping costs! > >P-) > > > >Regarding water pump speed, I've been working on this for a few weeks with > >my 13B dynafocal adaptor. I've mostly come to the conclusion (yet open to > >more data or ideas) that the factory pump and pulley are sized to provide > >the needed flow capacity at any given engine speed at the horsepower > >levels we are running at. So, to make it easy I'm sticking with the stock > >pump at the stock pulley ratio. > > > >Mike > >Mike McGee, RV-4 N996RV, O320-E2G, Hillsboro, OR > >13B in gestation mode, RD-1C, EC-2 > > > >At 12:06 2004-05-05, you wrote: > >>Well, that's interesting. This reminds me of a nagging question I have > >>had, but haven't asked. > >> > >>I was curious about the need to go to a smaller crank pulley to slow down > >>the water pump and alternators. > >> From memory, the crank pulley is about 5-1/2", the alternator pulleys > >> are about 2-1/2", and the water pump > >>pulley is about 4" diameter. > >> > >>So, running an RD-2C (2.85 ratio), the alternators will be turning about > >>20k during climb-out and the wp will be turning > >>about 10K rpm. That seems too fast to me. I could probably find larger > >>pulleys for the alternators, but > >>then there's the water pump pulley. Your unplanned experiment would > >>suggest that we can run the wp slower > >>and still cool adequately. > >> > >>This brings me to a second option. I think a simpler approach would be > >>to reduce the size of the crank pulley. > >>The problem is that I haven't found a multi-V reducing pulley at any of > >>the after-market suppliers. I really don't > >>want to change over all the multi-V pulleys to single V pulleys, but that > >>is one option. > >> > >>Another solution might be to find a smaller pulley from another vehicle > >>and adapt it to fit the rotary. If that doesn't > >>work, I could have one made. > >> > >>So, am I worrying about nothing, or is this a real problem? > >> > >>Mark > > > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T