Return-Path: <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
Received: from border.rfgonline.com ([65.171.123.242] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 3207967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 May 2004 21:07:44 -0400
Received: (qmail 11308 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 21:08:23 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com) (192.168.150.101)
  by 192.168.150.1 with SMTP; 5 May 2004 21:08:23 -0400
Received: from [192.168.150.28] ([192.168.150.28]) by EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Wed, 5 May 2004 21:07:44 -0400
Message-ID: <40998FE0.4080908@rfgonline.com>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 21:07:44 -0400
From: Chad Robinson <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Carbon Fiber Intake Manifolds
References: <list-3207968@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-3207968@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: crobinson@rfgonline.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2004 01:07:44.0524 (UTC) FILETIME=[89A3A4C0:01C43306]

Jim Sower wrote:
> <... carbon fiber corroding does not make much sense ...>
> Didn't make sense to Burt either.  IIRC he's the one who found out (much to
> his chagrin) and raised the alarm in the first place.  Lots and LOTS of
> verbiage about it in the canard lists.
> But thin SS plate and short headers might work well .... Jim S.
> PS  also, don't give up on ALL carbon fiber manifold until you've researched
> heat sensitivity.
> 
> 
> Alex Madsen wrote:

Sounds like something you could address with an SS shim plate between the 
header and any aluminum parts, anyway, right?

Regards,
Chad