Return-Path: Received: from border.rfgonline.com ([65.171.123.242] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 3126485 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:13:40 -0500 Received: (qmail 24720 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2004 21:03:42 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com) (192.168.150.101) by 192.168.150.1 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2004 21:03:42 -0500 Received: from rfgonline.com ([192.168.150.29]) by EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:13:39 -0500 Message-ID: <406634ED.4090908@rfgonline.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:14:05 -0500 From: Chad Robinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Transfer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: crobinson@rfgonline.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Mar 2004 02:13:39.0193 (UTC) FILETIME=[48B1FE90:01C4146A] The only problem is, most fuel pumps are rated for like 35-50gph, so it's going to take a while to transfer the fuel. Not to mention you have the engine not running but the fuel pump is drawing a few amps from the battery, draining it. On the other hand, if you're not looking to steal 35 gallons from your truck, but rather to pull out 5-10 for top-off purposes it's probably a great idea. Does anybody know where to look up the legalities of transporting fuel for specific states? The Kitplanes article is a nice start but I'm interested in something specific to Connecticut. I already own a utility trailer, so if I could safely/legally put a fuel tank to it for these purposes I'd definitely consider that route. I mean, I suppose it's not much different from carrying a bunch of 5-gallon fuel containers like a landscaper does, but I'd still like to check it out (online, I'm hoping)... marc wrote: > Rusty, > You've a fuel injected truck? How about a T in the fuel line/on off > valve at a convenient place and then just turn on the ignition. Fuel > pumps usually work that way. Let the car fuel pump do the work. > > Marc Wiese > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > > On > >>Behalf Of Russell Duffy >>Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 9:49 AM >>To: Rotary motors in aircraft >>Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Transfer >> >>Remember how I was planning to stick a hose down the filler pipe to > > pump > >>fuel from my truck's fuel tank? Well, it "sounded" like a good idea, > > but > >>it >>ain't gonna work. >> >>Yesterday, I needed just a few gallons to top off my tanks for a > > weight > >>and >>balance, so I tried to siphon fuel out of the truck. The hose goes > > about > >>a >>foot into the filler pipe and just hits a dead end. The truck has a > > long > >>filler neck, with a few bends, but I figured the small pipe I was > > using > >>would be able to negotiate those. When I couldn't get the hose in, I > > just > >>assumed they installed some sort of anti-siphon device (course screen > > of > >>some kind). After a bit of research, it seems that (some, all, >>???)manufacturers are installing one way ball valves in the filler > > pipes > >>to >>keep fuel from running out of the tank in the event the vehicle flips > > over > >>in a crash (and presumably the gas cap fails). >> >>I'm not sure exactly what's in my filler pipe, but I'm sure I can't > > get a > >>hose of any reasonable size in there to transfer fuel. I guess I'll > > have > >>to >>go back to the idea of having a separate tank I can put in the bed as >>needed. >> >>Cheers, >>Rusty (still working on the W&B numbers) >> >> >> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html