Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:53:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from bree.pipcom.com ([204.92.62.3] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with SMTP id 1912963 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:56:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 20178 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 22:57:00 -0000 Received: from ras3-15.pipcom.com (HELO new) (204.92.62.147) by bree.pipcom.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 22:57:00 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <004b01c2a556$34ae3dc0$5ed9fea9@new> From: "Peter Cowan" X-Original-To: "flyrotary" Subject: water pressure X-Original-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:54:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01C2A52C.285B2080" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01C2A52C.285B2080 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Today I'm seeing some different characteristics in the water pressure = readings. Used to be that after cooling down I could see 4 or 5 lbs = pressure for many days and I don't think increasing pressure after start = up was tied to rpm. Now pressure drops instantly on shutdown and is = closely tied to rpm to max of 15lbs as the engine is reved up. This = looks bad to me although temps in flight are fine. What do you think? Peter ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01C2A52C.285B2080 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Today I'm seeing some different = characteristics in=20 the water pressure readings. Used to be that after cooling down I could = see 4 or=20 5 lbs pressure for many days and I don't think increasing pressure after = start=20 up was tied to rpm. Now pressure drops instantly on shutdown and is = closely tied=20 to rpm to max of 15lbs as the engine is reved up. This looks bad to me = although=20 temps in flight are fine. What do you think?
Peter
------=_NextPart_000_0046_01C2A52C.285B2080--