X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-KAS-Score: 0 [] From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" Received: from pmg.Logan.com ([207.170.160.161] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.4.0) with ESMTPS id 3731230 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 18:30:14 -0500 Received: from pmg.Logan.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg.Logan.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ECA6629603 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2024 18:30:13 -0500 (EST) Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'stephen.izett@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=pmg.Logan.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="stephen.izett@gmail.com"; helo=mail-pf1-f171.google.com; client-ip=209.85.210.171 Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com (mail-pf1-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by pmg.Logan.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2024 18:30:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-725db141410so321996b3a.2 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:30:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733614206; x=1734219006; darn=lancaironline.net; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version:from :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XEH+2UzMefuXyPUIlb1tEp9GWKmunv4xn7x3tmlsbu0=; b=S5vlYm9LKtzgaX/YtfvrQPFEGFi/beoVc1nw0+2wrVdHVW0VatAXtrWs87HkLuKmZm rHhZjLTEBNlSncu3J3SrSiTyT6MsxlA1S2ZstG5865GAgDa03XxAqQ4CFgGSxAHIaxQ0 /IXRrxQU4PgKKGwPw/okgt84wA9q9YqePznddJAam1N2/RbGT4Wwet5fTJBf8C7LU/p9 jsByVZJHiL1JW87ZvpA/C8Rb65ooA+HbDylgRhVqq3JCAmGbWrXXJf4Ubv5jtZ7rsMfr S3xW+Sc9vq1vyiQVEkydfvyibfNSJv5yRAdirC+5scFpN+LSIPpdPOJQ/ZeoBnmYLRWt LLJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733614206; x=1734219006; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XEH+2UzMefuXyPUIlb1tEp9GWKmunv4xn7x3tmlsbu0=; b=mFshY4bC7B6Bngm8htklGXgnO954hG9GjhSXtE2EtmnTxEOtIVuvrk4eevTogMXD4T 4NkLo7zcPxXEeOKrLGhtouEKmDI+nwui46QI/IrjpYcu/166icJQxDQILdcE4whVLAdJ z76m1eyFldElOC+f6fHMZLONz09DCHTsk2qgS/44aexC72+P/MD7GzekyaFlVRndv/e/ ikKw9mGqRjIQCj+9jH9UTJr21Y4v0mSaw09oniAsLoWPu4VGchVEtadKyRsQNOD3pH7W 5+nqhN/OKjtZtbEPQurDVbUZ62pFfBzzpipnu1jUhwhRrDBoGFK0wXL+dw6087pXJe0/ uGqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxyhpf5gCybxx26mhblVyJLvRzTiyNov251NHiGxFyJzNQNPIyN e791GGU1AX0Ox8szrSQ0otosaMjb5pfeMuNXhiFafinalazYNrW+Z8qEcg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvAn6dHoyIrbRLEuO8P5/6tLig6DCG61l77aEDvTmIjkszAJkP+5uNhIr4zQiG yv/qMviMDpjL6srpHjB1dBGa8thRsN/cBcBKhHFjRvDnCIr5mfJH84B25ohjlt7hLqpb4E2WQLC 1LM0RvL6vzyv3oJMGDZp06h+l42rQWoE4tJQ9eLF2N+H+1NyVLRBM3Ijq8F4tNWecqhAYrAuVJX gjP50MyhjdjXN6gEdSN6UtHcAi2mOxHMsg6Oo6N/QAtZuntgVAi3h1TSauS/c980yTNXLVuyzcB pj64YaQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvyQC4naVXtQmbOwY6C+Os9NM6hOw60yAdkVq9OzYf3YuZKfNUx0PCkvQj+50tahddv6wFsw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2d0b:b0:725:b347:c3cc with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-725b81f84fbmr14183614b3a.23.1733614205730; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:30:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:8003:8809:f400:d45d:c27c:954f:4d8e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-725a29c5beasm4955774b3a.36.2024.12.07.15.30.04 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:30:05 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3EB630F9-1E45-4C9D-977C-C1BD7F537EBC" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3818.100.11.1.3\)) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] RWS Ring Drive & Damper Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 07:29:51 +0800 References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <6C25C698-3F1D-471E-BC57-C8B456FC4A03@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3818.100.11.1.3) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider FREEMAIL_REPLY 1 From and body contain different freemails HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block for more information. RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record --Apple-Mail=_3EB630F9-1E45-4C9D-977C-C1BD7F537EBC Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Welcome David. So if you have the original Input Shaft you would need to build what = Tracy called the 'Hub Adapter=E2=80=99, obviously with the spine to = match your =E2=80=98Input Shaft=E2=80=99. Steve > On 8 Dec 2024, at 7:18=E2=80=AFam, Stephen Izett = stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote: >=20 > Hi Guys >=20 > This is what I was able get from Tracy re his RD2 version without = isolator. >=20 > His early explanation and drawings: >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Steve Izett >=20 > TRACY CROOK email re RD2 modification to remove damper > =20 > Finally got around to flight testing the aftermarket flywheel setup = for the RWS redrive.=20 >=20 > The cracked flexplate issue some builders experienced came up at the = same time as my CNC source for input shafts lost the ability to make = them anymore due to loss of specialized spline making machinery. Since = I had to line up a new source I took this opportunity to review the = design from the input shaft back to the engine. Because the damper has = been such an expensive and labor-intensive part, it was looked at as = well. As a result, there have been enough changes to warrant a change = in the name so the new drives will be RD-2B & RD-2C. >=20 > In rethinking the drive I had the thought that since the relatively = low frequency primary resonance range of the drive train is taken care = of by the system lash, that left only the high frequency harmonics that = the damper is responsible for. This high range is the factor that = creates the red zone in rpm ranges found on some certified engines and = metal prop combinations. As far as I know, no one has used a metal = prop on an RD-1x drive so I decided that it was an unneeded requirement. = The new design has no damper at all and consequently it has a "No Metal = Propeller" restriction. >=20 > Replacing the damper is a flanged spline that is bolted directly to = the flywheel using the same bolts (longer bolts required) that attach = the flywheel to the counterweight. The spline is a different spec (15 = splines instead of 30) so it is not compatible with the RD-1 damper but = the new shaft itself is backward compatible with the remainder of the = drive. I retrofitted the same RD-1C that was on my RV-4 for these = tests. >=20 > The flywheel was an aluminum racing flywheel with the replaceable iron = friction surface unbolted and removed. Really looks pretty and = professional compared to the flexplate. Any of the aftermarket RX-7 & = RX-8 racing flywheels (steel or aluminum) that utilize the auto = counterweight may be used.=20 >=20 > As David Leonard found, these flywheels place the ring gear about .2" = closer to the engine than the flexplate. To compensate, I milled .2" = off the front surface of the adapter plate where the starter mounts. No = changes were needed to the starter itself. I did not bother to grind = the lead-in bevel on the ring gear teeth as discussed earlier. Starter = engagement was smooth anyway. >=20 > The RV-4 drive had over 700 hours on it and everything looked = beautiful inside. No signs of wear other than a shallow groove (~.002") = on the input shaft where the 1mm thrust bearing race between the two = needle bearings rides. Others have reported more than this in fewer = hours so this is an area to inspect carefully. The new input shaft is a = harder alloy (post machining through hardened 4340) than the the RD-1 = which was pre hardened 4140. This should reduce the wear in this area. = The old flexplate with over 1000 hours was still crack free. The = input shaft oil seal still looked and felt new so it was not replaced as = planed. Others have reported these leaking in much fewer hours. Don't = know the reason but I suspect that oil temperatures out of range may be = a factor. NEVER allow oil temps to exceed redline. If they go higher, = back off the power then land and correct the cooling system. >=20 > Only 1 hour of flight testing so far but all indications were good. = Operated the engine through the full range of rpm up to 7100 looking for = telltale signs of resonance. I was sort of expecting to feel, sense or = hear some indication of increased harshness in the drive with no rubber = anywhere in the system but if anything, it felt smoother. There was = none of the 'Waaa --- Waaa' warbling sound (like a twin engine with the = engines out of sync) that I had with the Ross drive years ago. So far = I'm very satisfied with the results but it's still early in the tests.=20= > =20 > Tracy Crook >=20 > >=20 >> On 7 Dec 2024, at 1:41=E2=80=AFam, David Walker drw.aa@hotmail.com = wrote: >>=20 >> Hello, >> New to the group, but longtime advocate and study of the rotary = engine in Aviation. >> I am building and RV-4 and thought I had a complete RWS redrive = assembly. >> Turns out I am missing the flywheel or ring gear and damper assembly = that connects the redrive to the motor. >> Does anyone have a spare? Or know how to fabricate this piece. >> David Walker=20 >> __!__ >> -----o-(_)-o----- >=20 --Apple-Mail=_3EB630F9-1E45-4C9D-977C-C1BD7F537EBC Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Welcome = David.

So if you have the original Input Shaft you = would need to build what Tracy called the 'Hub Adapter=E2=80=99, = obviously with the spine to match your =E2=80=98Input = Shaft=E2=80=99.

Steve


On 8 Dec 2024, at 7:18=E2=80=AFam, Stephen Izett = stephen.izett@gmail.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> = wrote:

Hi Guys

This is what = I was able get from Tracy re his RD2 version without = isolator.

His early explanation and = drawings:

Cheers

Steve = Izett

TRACY CROOK email re RD2 modification to remove = damper
 
Finally got around to flight testing the aftermarket flywheel = setup for the RWS redrive. 

The cracked flexplate issue some builders = experienced came up at the same time as my CNC source for input shafts = lost the ability to make them anymore due to loss of specialized spline = making machinery.  Since I had to line up a new source I took this = opportunity to review the design from the input shaft back to the = engine.   Because the damper has been such an expensive and = labor-intensive part, it was looked at as well.   As a result, = there have been enough changes to warrant a change in the name so the = new drives will be RD-2B & RD-2C.

In rethinking the drive I had the thought = that since the relatively low frequency primary resonance range of the = drive train is taken care of by the system lash, that left only the high = frequency harmonics that the damper is responsible for.  This high = range is the factor that creates the red zone in rpm ranges found on = some certified engines and metal prop combinations.   As far as I = know, no one has used a metal prop on an RD-1x drive so I decided that = it was an unneeded requirement.  The new design has no damper at = all and consequently it has a "No Metal Propeller" = restriction.

Replacing = the damper is a flanged spline that is bolted directly to the flywheel = using the same bolts (longer bolts required) that attach the flywheel to = the counterweight.  The spline is a different spec (15 splines = instead of 30) so it is not compatible with the RD-1 damper but the new = shaft itself is backward compatible with the remainder of the = drive.  I retrofitted the same RD-1C that was on my RV-4 for these = tests.

The flywheel was = an aluminum racing flywheel with the replaceable iron friction surface = unbolted and removed.  Really looks pretty and professional = compared to the flexplate.  Any of the aftermarket RX-7 & RX-8 = racing flywheels (steel or aluminum) that utilize the auto counterweight = may be used. 

As = David Leonard found, these flywheels place the ring gear about .2" = closer to the engine than the flexplate.  To compensate, I milled = .2" off the front surface of the adapter plate where the starter = mounts.  No changes were needed to the starter itself.   = I did not bother to grind the lead-in bevel on the ring gear teeth as = discussed earlier.   Starter engagement was smooth = anyway.

The RV-4 drive = had over 700 hours on it and everything looked beautiful inside.  = No signs of wear other than a shallow groove (~.002") on the input shaft = where the 1mm thrust bearing race between the two needle bearings = rides.  Others have reported more than this in fewer hours so this = is an area to inspect carefully.  The new input shaft is a harder = alloy (post machining through hardened 4340) than the the RD-1 which was = pre hardened 4140.  This should reduce the wear in this area. =   The old flexplate with over 1000 hours was still crack = free.   The input shaft oil seal still looked and felt new so = it was not replaced as planed.  Others have reported these leaking = in much fewer hours.  Don't know the reason but I suspect that oil = temperatures out of range may be a factor.  NEVER allow oil temps = to exceed redline.  If they go higher, back off the power then land = and correct the cooling system.

Only 1 hour of flight testing so far but all indications were = good.  Operated the engine through the full range of rpm up to 7100 = looking for telltale signs of resonance.   I was sort of = expecting to feel, sense or hear some indication of increased harshness = in the drive with no rubber anywhere in the system but if anything, it = felt smoother.  There was none of the 'Waaa --- Waaa' warbling = sound (like a twin engine with the engines out of sync) that I had with = the Ross drive years ago.  So far I'm very satisfied with the = results but it's still early in the tests. 
   
Tracy Crook

<RD2_HubAdapter.jpeg>= ;<RD2inputshaft.jpeg>=

On 7 Dec 2024, = at 1:41=E2=80=AFam, David Walker drw.aa@hotmail.com = <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:

Hello,
New to the group, but = longtime advocate and study of the rotary engine in Aviation.
I am building and RV-4 = and thought I had a complete RWS redrive assembly.
Turns out I am missing = the flywheel or ring gear and damper assembly that connects the redrive = to the motor.
Does anyone have a spare? = Or know how to fabricate this piece.
    David = Walker 
      =      __!__ <image0.jpeg&= gt;
-----o-(_)-o-----
=


= --Apple-Mail=_3EB630F9-1E45-4C9D-977C-C1BD7F537EBC--