From: kenpowell@comcast.net
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject:  Re: C mounting on a B plate?? Renesis & RD-1C drivetesting
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:30:28 +0000
Message-Id: <032320041830.11463.5560@comcast.net>

You are absolutely right Kelly; I think that we were asking for the 2.85 even before Paul L.  Matter of fact, you were probably the first since I think you already had a 2.85 Ross when we first started talking about this stuff years ago.  And of course there are a few 2.85 Ross drives flying.  

I received my RD-1C last week.  It's beautiful and I really wish that I had a FINISHED RV to put it on.  Maybe I'll get laid off so that I will have some time off to finish my airplanes.

But mostly, we are really fortunate to have a man of Tracy's abilities leading the way and building the parts that most of us couldn't build in a thousand years.  Thanks Tracy.

Ken Powell
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> 			
> 			
> 			
> > I hate to tell you guys 'I told you so, but...'.  An't the 2.85 ratio great!  
> > Congradulations Tracy on your results so far.  I have also been preaching the 
> > benefits of peripheral ports, but to no avail.  And since it doesn't look like 
> I 
> > am going to get an airplane built anytime soon, it looks like someone else 
> will 
> > have to prove the superiority of the PP.  Of course, the Renesis will probably 
> > prove superior to the PP so this may not matter.  Tracy, BTW my prop program 
> > (written by the guy that did the RV-9 wing, I can't seem to remember his name 
> at 
> > the moment) calculated a 91 pitch for a 72" diameter. Close to yours but I 
> > realize that there alot of other factors as well.
> > 
> > Ken Powell
>    
>       Ken,
>        How long have we been begging Tracy to produce the 2.85? My 2.85 should 
> be
> 
>   shipped any day now. That is if Tracy will land his -4 long enough ship it!
> 
>     Kelly Troyer 
> 
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html