Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3114614 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:10:27 -0500 Received: from 204.127.135.59 ([204.127.135.59]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2004032307101711200mrkjee>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:10:17 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.83] by 204.127.135.59; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:10:17 +0000 From: keltro@att.net To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] C mounting on a B plate?? Renesis & RD-1C drivetesting Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 07:10:17 +0000 Message-Id: <032320040710.17097.2cc7@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Feb 13 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= > I hate to tell you guys 'I told you so, but...'. An't the 2.85 ratio great! > Congradulations Tracy on your results so far. I have also been preaching the > benefits of peripheral ports, but to no avail. And since it doesn't look like I > am going to get an airplane built anytime soon, it looks like someone else will > have to prove the superiority of the PP. Of course, the Renesis will probably > prove superior to the PP so this may not matter. Tracy, BTW my prop program > (written by the guy that did the RV-9 wing, I can't seem to remember his name at > the moment) calculated a 91 pitch for a 72" diameter. Close to yours but I > realize that there alot of other factors as well. > > Ken Powell Ken, How long have we been begging Tracy to produce the 2.85? My 2.85 should be shipped any day now. That is if Tracy will land his -4 long enough ship it! Kelly Troyer