X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "James R. Osborn" Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.6) with ESMTPS id 8116186 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:50:34 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.51; envelope-from=rxcited@gmail.com Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so88706252pac.3 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+OmgkRPd1BqQlHOJXU/7J8E30dUTgzNl+T1/D3qSwbk=; b=PxeneVMFNXI1mHEFNs6vV4Vz5jVZEt7p/r5ZgDcHqYGgXa79HuX73PajQ8q3DVOwAY BD2shqe08snaxG0cgYTZENt9U9q9SwEATJ4nur2YQaejwaZbUj3StkxTn34MsVlqT7S6 dATQFmKMskoXN3yXhrjSvC1xIfaBIwCbn8PYFTDVMeQeUQkCCU8hXckxzRLm7dhkUqpl +SSpNaGM1j4SjH8phDr9zOAWyAToLDB9e8NRBQwV+eYWLgviPX2UU30NtLOnQrEivVnH 7eiJst0WBxLHBDvWnjro/7jDlo2e/fXotOgJdMsGQtofJienaTTBnVp3U6ZYKQg0LvhW 3TiQ== X-Received: by 10.66.228.199 with SMTP id sk7mr11419324pac.8.1446241816871; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2620:83:8001:24::1:1c35? ([2620:83:8001:24::1:1c35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ku1sm9987361pbc.47.2015.10.30.14.50.16 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 20B with RD-1C Prop Options In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:50:11 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2DACDB09-503A-4A51-9368-7C2550D3554A@gmail.com> References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Hey Steve, I had not thought about that problem. Ear muffs? I=92d love to see = some photos of your test stand. You can send them to me offline if = that=92s more appropriate. Thanks. -- James Osborn rxcited@gmail.com > On Oct 30, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Steven W. Boese = wrote: >=20 > James, >=20 > I have an engine test stand that was used to develop a NA 3B = installation and is presently used in development of a turbo Renesis = installation. If a prop suitable for flight is used on the test stand, = operation at high power causes the prop to cavitate. When this happens, = the sound is deafening and the vibration is also felt through the = ground. It is worth considering that extended operation of the = cavitated prop may be detrimental to the longevity of the prop and = possibly the operator. I don't know exactly what "extended" means and = it is something I hope not to find out.=20 >=20 > FWIW >=20 > Steve Boese > RV6A, 1986 13B NA, RD1A, EC2 =20 >=20 > ________________________________________ > From: Rotary motors in aircraft on = behalf of James R. Osborn > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 9:12 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 20B with RD-1C Prop Options >=20 > Hi Bill, >=20 > Yeah after I sent that I realized slip was a much smaller difference. = The difference between top speed and standing still is 100% slip! >=20 > I don=92t really know what to expect for HP. I threw those numbers = out there for feedback. So what numbers say for unported site port, = medium street port side port, and peripheral port on a 20B can we = reasonably achieve? >=20 > Thanks for more input and numbers. It will be interesting to try to = work it out on the ground and the more I think about it, adjustability = will be a real big help. I did recall correctly that a friend has an = old dyno I can borrow. So I guess I will move in that direction first = and set the prop selection aside for now. >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html