X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "James R. Osborn" Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.6) with ESMTPS id 8113860 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:20:01 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.53; envelope-from=rxcited@gmail.com Received: by padhy1 with SMTP id hy1so52250741pad.0 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:19:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tvQGpxxUbWGKsLx1s+oOXezItjrsHwIWsyYodc7BM7Y=; b=JmRub8xz27xvdMPckZUHHjiaRq6/RW9fuR7/Ohk9LDLu/mA+v8SavyxUPcv86zCZB4 2ETS6OSIo6FGKvmQZPtYZ3iBX4c5VsM20HsB8TGqwtJSu5IzMd5PZVluZSQhQcgEDc3/ R7nbiTFiwvlgDDtiZI+f0Gi20kQqnb3FpqnRx5h9NIQZSxBgUwp5bry0I3Jdp9JNn6Ky rRTzCQ2oiSkMTa/k+yeIc4ZhEmUhZJckpaLKz4OCJrRWSSRnapxuNqubCBHAjO4SXsYV WLm+2gaqQabaqIv8dpNxt18MC2rFBHYTsE4xBtAzvULbslXiDKuSUkgEWlEhu/DIQc4Q Bcjg== X-Received: by 10.66.158.74 with SMTP id ws10mr5636837pab.121.1446171585413; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.15.13] (c-67-169-99-20.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.99.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm4755647pat.34.2015.10.29.19.19.44 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\)) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 20B with RD-1C Prop Options In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:19:44 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <27CD4C1B-4D31-41CC-8656-8F14CE2B3967@gmail.com> References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094) Thanks for the input Tracy! So is the difference between top speed rpm = and static rpm the =E2=80=9Cslip=E2=80=9D? > On Oct 29, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Tracy = wrote: >=20 > Hi James, > HP targets sound doable, but those rpm numbers are probably off. = Remember that with a fixed pitch prop, hp varies as the CUBE of rpm. = Would recommend propping for a max power at top speed rpm of about 7000. = That will give you a static rpm of around 6000. >=20 > Will get those instruction manuals you asked about to you next time = I'm in the office. >=20 > Tracy >=20 > Sent from my iPad >=20 >> On Oct 29, 2015, at 16:22, James R. Osborn = wrote: >>=20 >> Hi guys, >>=20 >> So I am going to be building an RV-10. I sourced Bobby=E2=80=99s = spare 20B / RD-1C combo and my plan is to work on the motor first, kind = of bass-ackward but that is what I am doing. My plan is to build a = motor/mount test stand and work everything out on the ground before I = ever put it in an airframe. I plan to set it up NA using the existing = side port configuration. I don=E2=80=99t know if it is ported - I am = going to attempt to determine this by inspection without cracking it = open and doing a dynamic compression test to evaluate the health of the = motor. If it is necessary to entirely rebuild the motor, I would = probably go PP. So I am thinking the target HP as it is would be in the = 275 HP range and probably 325 HP if it ends up being a PP. How do these = numbers sound to you all? >>=20 >> I will be looking for a way to dyno it, hopefully borrow one to get = some data. But I was also thinking about just getting an appropriate = fixed pitch prop and working through the bugs based on static run ups. = I like the idea of a three blade prop. I like the idea of optimizing = for cruise at 75%, say 5800 rpm which would put full throttle at 7733 = rpm on the 20B. At 5800 rpm, the prop would be spinning 2035 rpm and at = full throttle 2713 rpm (using the 2.85 ratio RD-1C PSRU). Do all these = numbers sound about right? >>=20 >> If so, then how do I choose a prop that will result in 2713 rpm = static run up at full throttle, but be tuned for efficiency at 2035 rpm = cruise? I am assuming at these reasonable RPMs that it will be a larger = swing and the three blade makes sense - what do you think? Is there a = convenient way to find props out there that will work at the target full = throttle HP of 275 or 325? Also if you guys have any good resources to = learn about how to figure these things out (books, web pages, online = calculators, etc.) that would be great! >>=20 >> Another option might be to go with something like the IVOPROP Magnum, = either ground adjustable or electric inflight adjustable. What do you = guys think of these? Would the adjustability really help me adapt to = however my power plant turns out? Would the extra complexity be worth = it? For the ground adjustable one, I am thinking the process would be: = 1. select the =E2=80=9Ccorrect=E2=80=9D swing (how?) and go for three = blades, 2) use ground adjustability and work up to THE pitch while I = tune the motor until I achieve full throttle static run up around 7700 = RPM. Will this result in a reasonably efficient setting for 75% cruise? = Am I thinking about this clearly? All opinions are welcome. >>=20 >> There=E2=80=99s a lot for you to chew on! >>=20 >> =E2=80=94 James >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html