X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Ben Haas" Received: from BAY004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com ([65.54.190.231] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.6) with ESMTPS id 8113461 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:37:29 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.190.231; envelope-from=stol83001@live.com Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.199]) by BAY004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:37:12 -0700 Received: from SN1PR13MB0255.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.162.98.24) by SN1PR13MB0254.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.162.98.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.318.9; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:37:11 +0000 Received: from SN1PR13MB0255.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.98.24]) by SN1PR13MB0255.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.98.24]) with mapi id 15.01.0318.003; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:37:11 +0000 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 20B with RD-1C Prop Options Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] 20B with RD-1C Prop Options Thread-Index: AQHREoehwAuupb0Ho0atStqKVccCjp6C/HOO Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:37:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: lancaironline.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lancaironline.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=live.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [FJY5HwVy8r7wxoLWdzqHfqDid3Ju2U6q] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;SN1PR13MB0254;23:bN98jz9wzMSaEhNaKS/u8jB/IcwViPrvGPeSrVZnD7CV1Oi+Jj+IvY19iJ9xZj3FBBLJufdaiNrm2RmrMrc24+0CBMeo3k3Mdau9yZ+IwjfNG/c/U2EqShrfWeFKUPTlMPQzwG/6SqRFWpu2ed6LAcvdIL32sHAyEUNkuRB0Jg2zC5u55V6xUON+y4z1KTvVmWquOSITtHm4XRZJikRAdQ==;5:iY/Fiy3sBJDhOWGEh18mCORYMVBSixUhZdiX7SdsE4sJuu2jQC5GwFCT6201wIx7gebJHWiI1DURtsuSW3La0VDJ3HyAI1GXBuLQMHkqLr0ab4UsrMq4l1ttXvnv89wFSFC26F3G3qnETzL7SvOo5w==;24:2HQC9E8dwNr3SOeEgv+BJcPFKBdbOA9XlxdiN2HA9sWxqJIBUK93EYj5HgROOIRUSttEseLx3XEGS6lYuIdMhmzkzvAFYJGRhifSq0xWufs=;20:Kk//3iqQji/coDo4jTLZawF2o3YU/grDM3Kt1KGwa+5EpzHTqri8s6s8QJ9JhgWs++WRe5MhVxX8D1Sr30/ZXw== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR13MB0254; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(81415001)(82015046);SRVR:SN1PR13MB0254;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR13MB0254; x-forefront-prvs: 0744CFB5E8 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(7070004)(98900002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;SCL:1;SRVR:SN1PR13MB0254;H:SN1PR13MB0255.namprd13.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-1-318-9-msonline-outlook-d9f08.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Oct 2015 21:37:11.0836 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR13MB0254 Return-Path: stol83001@live.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2015 21:37:12.0754 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9000120:01D11291] I have had good luck with my Ivo Prop...... I bought both the Magnum series blades and the Magnum Paddle blades.. Start= ed out at 84" diameter, They were too dangerous as that large a diameter ha= s a leverage effect that tried to roll me inverted at slow airspeed and fu= ll power ( 400 HP.... I am a piston guy though)... had Ivo cut them down to= 76".. I also got the kit to switch back from two to three blades.... Plan= e was slightly faster with the 2 blade .. But ALOT smoother with the three = blade set up... I also have the inflight adjustability... Works good. Prop= has over 500 hours... Good deal for the money....=20 I originally priced a MT, but they quoted 14 grand......... No thanks.. ________________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft on behalf of = James R. Osborn Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:22 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] 20B with RD-1C Prop Options Hi guys, So I am going to be building an RV-10. I sourced Bobby=92s spare 20B / RD-= 1C combo and my plan is to work on the motor first, kind of bass-ackward bu= t that is what I am doing. My plan is to build a motor/mount test stand an= d work everything out on the ground before I ever put it in an airframe. I= plan to set it up NA using the existing side port configuration. I don=92= t know if it is ported - I am going to attempt to determine this by inspect= ion without cracking it open and doing a dynamic compression test to evalua= te the health of the motor. If it is necessary to entirely rebuild the mot= or, I would probably go PP. So I am thinking the target HP as it is would = be in the 275 HP range and probably 325 HP if it ends up being a PP. How d= o these numbers sound to you all? I will be looking for a way to dyno it, hopefully borrow one to get some da= ta. But I was also thinking about just getting an appropriate fixed pitch = prop and working through the bugs based on static run ups. I like the idea= of a three blade prop. I like the idea of optimizing for cruise at 75%, s= ay 5800 rpm which would put full throttle at 7733 rpm on the 20B. At 5800 = rpm, the prop would be spinning 2035 rpm and at full throttle 2713 rpm (usi= ng the 2.85 ratio RD-1C PSRU). Do all these numbers sound about right? If so, then how do I choose a prop that will result in 2713 rpm static run = up at full throttle, but be tuned for efficiency at 2035 rpm cruise? I am = assuming at these reasonable RPMs that it will be a larger swing and the th= ree blade makes sense - what do you think? Is there a convenient way to fi= nd props out there that will work at the target full throttle HP of 275 or = 325? Also if you guys have any good resources to learn about how to figure= these things out (books, web pages, online calculators, etc.) that would b= e great! Another option might be to go with something like the IVOPROP Magnum, eithe= r ground adjustable or electric inflight adjustable. What do you guys thin= k of these? Would the adjustability really help me adapt to however my pow= er plant turns out? Would the extra complexity be worth it? For the groun= d adjustable one, I am thinking the process would be: 1. select the =93cor= rect=94 swing (how?) and go for three blades, 2) use ground adjustability a= nd work up to THE pitch while I tune the motor until I achieve full throttl= e static run up around 7700 RPM. Will this result in a reasonably efficien= t setting for 75% cruise? Am I thinking about this clearly? All opinions = are welcome. There=92s a lot for you to chew on! =97 James -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.= html