Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #62166
From: Luciano, Luis I CIV PEOSUB, PMS404P <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Shall we get excited?!?!
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:48:24 +0000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Signed Data (Text SHA1)
Just a little food for thought, the Tokyo Motor Show is coming up at the end of October.  In it, Mazda is expected to present a "new concept" alongside its 50 year old Cosmo Sport... shall we get excited at a possible showing of their 16x twin turbo?!?!

http://www.speedhunters.com/2015/09/rotary-return-mazda-announces-new-sports-car/

R/
Luis Luciano
Velocity XL-5 "Dulcinea"

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:08 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tracy's RENESIS info

October 5th, 2013 takes you back to the old website.

https://web.archive.org/web/20131005182011/http://www.rotaryaviation.com/



> On Oct 14, 2015, at 12:44 PM, James R. Osborn <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>
> I haven’t used the Wayback Machine - that is very cool and handy.  Thanks Charlie.  Mark, can you share what date you had to go back to to find the old materials?
>
> — James
>
>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Mark McClure <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the info - I was actually hoping it would help me with my intake plans. And it has.
>>
>> Thanks for the link Charlie there's some good pictures on the old site - including the intake modifications that Tracy use to offer.
>>
>> I think realistically I just need to jump in instead of planning to perfection.
>>
>> Thanks for all the help,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Tracy <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> HI Mark,
>>>  I never did post a lot on the Renesis because for our purposes there really is not much difference between it and the earlier 13B.  Here are the main ones:
>>>
>>> 1.  The bare block weight is about 10 pounds lighter, mainly due to the water pump changes.
>>> 2.   The exhaust ports are in the side housings instead of the rotor housings so there are three ports instead of two.
>>> 3.    The 'safe' max continuous RPM is maybe 1000 rpm higher.  The best BSFC rpm is still the same at 5000 - 5600 rpm.
>>> 4.   EGT is about 100 F cooler.
>>> 5.   The exhaust noise is considerably less making it a bit easier to muffle.
>>>
>>> That's about it.  The power and fuel consumption at any given RPM are the same as before in aircraft applications.  The other minor differences are internal parts that don't matter unless you are overhauling the engine.
>>>
>>> Tracy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 11:51, Mark McClure <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Reading though the conversion book again the RENESIS info is mentioned but referenced to the website.
>>>>
>>>> Tracy, any way we can get the RENESIS info posted back on the website or to the group? Or does anyone have it saved offline?
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>>> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>>
>> --
>> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Content Unaltered as verified By:
presented certificate is issued by an unknown authority:LUCIANO.LUIS.I.1182382309 <luis.i.luciano@navy.mil>
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster