From: "Mark McClure" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=17.172.220.113; envelope-from=markmcclure@me.com
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Tracy's RENESIS info
Message-id: <A2BAA1A8-ADDF-4650-B1EF-D5AE4B21882C@me.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:08:19 -0400
References: <list-8070634@logan.com>
In-reply-to: <list-8070634@logan.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

October 5th, 2013 takes you back to the old website.=20

https://web.archive.org/web/20131005182011/http://www.rotaryaviation.com/


> On Oct 14, 2015, at 12:44 PM, James R. Osborn <flyrotary@lancaironline.net=
> wrote:
>=20
> I haven=E2=80=99t used the Wayback Machine - that is very cool and handy. =
 Thanks Charlie.  Mark, can you share what date you had to go back to to fin=
d the old materials?
>=20
> =E2=80=94 James
>=20
>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Mark McClure <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> w=
rote:
>>=20
>> Thanks for the info - I was actually hoping it would help me with my inta=
ke plans. And it has.=20
>>=20
>> Thanks for the link Charlie there's some good pictures on the old site - i=
ncluding the intake modifications that Tracy use to offer.=20
>>=20
>> I think realistically I just need to jump in instead of planning to perfe=
ction.
>>=20
>> Thanks for all the help,
>> Mark
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Tracy <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> HI Mark,
>>>  I never did post a lot on the Renesis because for our purposes there re=
ally is not much difference between it and the earlier 13B.  Here are the ma=
in ones:
>>>=20
>>> 1.  The bare block weight is about 10 pounds lighter, mainly due to the w=
ater pump changes.
>>> 2.   The exhaust ports are in the side housings instead of the rotor hou=
sings so there are three ports instead of two.
>>> 3.    The 'safe' max continuous RPM is maybe 1000 rpm higher.  The best B=
SFC rpm is still the same at 5000 - 5600 rpm.
>>> 4.   EGT is about 100 F cooler.
>>> 5.   The exhaust noise is considerably less making it a bit easier to mu=
ffle.
>>>=20
>>> That's about it.  The power and fuel consumption at any given RPM are th=
e same as before in aircraft applications.  The other minor differences are i=
nternal parts that don't matter unless you are overhauling the engine.
>>>=20
>>> Tracy
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>=20
>>>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 11:51, Mark McClure <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> w=
rote:
>>>>=20
>>>> Reading though the conversion book again the RENESIS info is mentioned b=
ut referenced to the website.=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Tracy, any way we can get the RENESIS info posted back on the website o=
r to the group? Or does anyone have it saved offline?
>>>>=20
>>>> Mark
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> --
>>>> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>>> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/L=
ist.html
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/Li=
st.html
>>=20
>> --
>> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/Lis=
t.html
>=20
>=20
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List=
.html