From: "Tracy" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.173; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Tracy's RENESIS info
References: <list-8064277@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <list-8064277@logan.com>
Message-Id: <6D7779BD-A269-477B-89C8-1130D0F5E6DA@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:28:27 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

HI Mark,
    I never did post a lot on the Renesis because for our purposes there rea=
lly is not much difference between it and the earlier 13B.  Here are the mai=
n ones:

1.  The bare block weight is about 10 pounds lighter, mainly due to the wate=
r pump changes.
2.   The exhaust ports are in the side housings instead of the rotor housing=
s so there are three ports instead of two.
3.    The 'safe' max continuous RPM is maybe 1000 rpm higher.  The best BSFC=
 rpm is still the same at 5000 - 5600 rpm.
4.   EGT is about 100 F cooler.
5.   The exhaust noise is considerably less making it a bit easier to muffle=
.

That's about it.  The power and fuel consumption at any given RPM are the sa=
me as before in aircraft applications.  The other minor differences are inte=
rnal parts that don't matter unless you are overhauling the engine.

Tracy


Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 11:51, Mark McClure <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrot=
e:
>=20
> Reading though the conversion book again the RENESIS info is mentioned but=
 referenced to the website.=20
>=20
> Tracy, any way we can get the RENESIS info posted back on the website or t=
o the group? Or does anyone have it saved offline?
>=20
> Mark
>=20
>=20
> --
> Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List=
.html