Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #61411
From: Charlie England <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: SPAM-LOW: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Rotary Engine & Fuel Valves
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:49:32 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
On 11/4/2014 10:29 AM, Thomas Mann wrote:
>…… and all the homebuilt kit makers that I'm aware of specifically say to never operate the plane with a fuel selector on 'both'.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Then you have never looked closely at a Velocity.
More specifically, you have never seen my Velocity which was something of a worst case scenario when I started picking it apart and reviewing how it was built and the many failure modes that needed to be corrected before I would fly it.

This system had a feed from both wing tanks to a common sump that had no valve at all. It was plumbed straight to the electric fuel pump and them off to the engine.

It now has a split sump with a left/right/both selector (Andair). The electric boost pump is low enough that “un-porting” should never be an issue.

My purpose as far as offering another viewpoint was spawned by talk of “T” connections between two tanks.
It was a somewhat lengthy and diplomatic way of saying “Bad Idea.”

T Mann

Sent from Windows Mail


Was the 'both tanks feeding a sump, with no valve' setup the way that the Velocity factory said to plumb the system, or something concocted by the builder?


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster